
According to the person in charge of the Supreme Law, since 2002, copyright cases that have been accepted by people's courts have been ranked first in all intellectual property cases. In 2011, for example, the local courts in the country received a total of 59,822 intellectual property first-priority cases, of which 35,185 were copyright cases. The number of copyright disputes involving the right to disseminate information on the Internet accounted for about 60% of all copyright cases in recent years. In the trial of these cases, how to define the right of infringement of information on the Internet, in particular how to determine the legal responsibilities of network service providers, has become a challenge for people's courts to try.
According to the newly issued judicial interpretation, online users and network service providers, without the permission of the right holder, provide information, performances, audio and video products that the rights holder has the right to disseminate information on the Internet through the information network, unless otherwise provided by laws and administrative regulations. It will constitute a violation of information network communication rights.
In this judicial interpretation, the behavior of netizens is also stipulated. According to the judicial interpretation, “when network service providers provide network services, if they instigate or help network users to infringe on information network communication rights, network service providers must bear joint and several liability for online users infringing rights holders’ information network communication rights. "The network service provider shall induce and encourage network users to infringe on the right of spreading information on the Internet through verbal communication, technical support, reward points, etc. The people's court shall determine that it constitutes a tort of infringement."
At the same time, the judicial interpretation decided that “when a network service provider can prove that it has taken reasonable and effective technical measures and it is still difficult to discover that a network user has violated the right to disseminate information on the Internet, the people’s court should determine that it is not at fault.†In addition, the The interpretation also stipulated the issue of jurisdiction over cases of civil disputes that infringe on the right to disseminate information on the Internet.
16 Port USB 1U Cabinet Charger
Our new 16 port USB1U built -in charger provides the fastest charging, and is supported by tablet computers and other battery -intensive personal electronic equipment! Adopting a compact and lightweight design, without occupying position space, can be a variety of offices, restaurants, retail, education or personal devices configuration. The USB has a built -in fast charging to up to 200 watt charging power, making it very suitable for most tablet computers, smartphones, portable battery charging equipment, and most other devices that meet the USB 2.0. Our new 16 port USB charging hub station has inventory and provides free transportation for free!
Hub USB Charging Station 16 Ports 200W, 16 Port USB Charger 1U Cabinet, 16-Port USB-C HUB
shenzhen ns-idae technology co.,ltd , https://www.szbestchargers.com